Dravot is a representation of the worst of the British Empire. Hes greedy with the power and wants it all to himself. Peachy is the good side and the best of the Empire. He is always ready to lend a 01.05H Theme Comparison Chart and Response Questions
Complete this portion of the chart with evidence from “The White Man’s Burden.”
Literal Interpretive Evaluative
“The White Man’s Burden” Why is this in the poem? What is the message about the British Empire?
Description of characters/speakers represented in the poem:
The narrator is speaking of the soldiers and speaks on how they are mistreated.

This is in the poem to show how he views the British Empire and how it functions. To show Kipling’s views on British Imperialism.
Plot/Topic of Each Stanza:
Stanza 1:
Stanza 1 talks about sending the children to serve the people that have been captured. The Europeans are wild people and the narrator does not believe that the natives are the same.
Stanza 2:
Stanza 2 talks of the way one should gain profit which is by the works of others.
Stanza 3:
Stanza 3 says that it is time to end famine and disease for everywhere but not to get too wrapped up and become lazy because that will cause their hopes to not become a reality.
Stanza 4:
Stanza 4 tells them to take charge and pick up the burden again. They are to leave their marks on the ports with the living and the dead.
Stanza 5:
They were blamed by the people that they protect, and they were hated by the ones that they guarded and asks why he brought them out of bondage.
Stanza 6:
Stanza 6 tells them not to use the freedom theyre given as a shield because they will always be watched and judged by the people that they are merely trying to help.
Stanza 7:
This stanza reveals that they will find their man hood when they search for it because it was earned in all the thankless years and the years they were under appreciated.
1. It speaks of the Britain’s invading the other surrounding lands.
2. To express how the people need to gain profit and tell them how to do it.
3. They are trying to help the others in different countries
4. The men are treated as trash and not as royal men.
5. The British made the people work like peasants and mocked them while they literally worked to death.
6. To show that there is no hiding from the people on the sidelines who are sitting back and judging them for their actions.
7. Even though the things they did went under appreciated, they would find their man hood when they realized that they earned it. It shows the british bringing other countries together so that they will all benefit from the profit that is being earned by working together.
Theme: Based on the evidence in this chart for “The White Man’s Burden,” what is the author’s message about the British Empire?
Kipling is trying to simplify British Imperialism and bring the very much undeveloped nation to a more uniform civilization.

We Will Write a Custom Essay Specifically
For You For Only $13.90/page!

order now

Complete this portion of the chart with evidence from The Man Who Would Be King.
Literal Interpretive Evaluative
What happens in the text? Why is this in the story? What is the message about the British Empire?
Character Action:
Dravot and Carnehan make a contract with one another to become kings of Kafiristan.

Additional Character Action:
Dravot is ready to make an empire for himself

Additional Character Action:
Carnahan becomes upset with Dravot because he is acting like he is the only king and doesn’t want to share the throne as they were meant to.
Their contract is important because it sets the story in motion. It shows the business-like approach the two men have toward their goal of being kings.

This is in the story to lead up to Dravot’s inevitable fall.

This is a hint to the kings becoming upset with one another and for shadows the impending bad event to follow.
The contract shows that the two characters are attempting to mimic the formal operations of the Empire.

The empire was built upon single rule and that is what Dravot is trying to make happen, but Carnehan is not in agreement and is trying to prevent it from happening.
Character Statement:
Carnehan says, “We have been boiler-fitters, engine-drivers, petty contractors, and all that, and we have decided that India isn’t big enough for such as us.”

Additional Character Statement:
“‘I won’t make a Nation,’ says he. ‘I’ll make an Empire! These men aren’t Indians;
they’re English! Look at their eyes— look at their mouths. Look at the way they stand up. They sit on chairs in their own houses. They’re the Lost Tribes, or something
like it, and they’ve grown to be English.”

Additional Character Statement:
“‘Go to your blasted priests, then!’ I said, and I was sorry when I made that remark,
but it did hurt me sore to find Daniel talking so superior when I’d drilled all the men, and done all he told me.

This quote provides a backstory for the two characters.

This quote was placed here to help the reader see that Dravot think he is the only king and that Carnehan is irrelevant.

This quote is in to provide how he was Upset Carnehan is with Dravot and how he won’t stand down. He is going to stand up for himself and will not tolerate being treated as if he is under Dravot.
This quote shows how the two characters attempted to work within the limitations of the Empire and how they were dissatisfied with the outcomes.

This quote shows how power can go to one’s mind and Dravot has become so consumed with power that he forgot about Carnehan and did not take him into consideration.
Theme: Based on the evidence in this chart for The Man Who Would Be King, what is the author’s message about the British Empire?

Response Questions
Use textual support from your reading of pages 25-37 to answer the questions below in complete sentences.
1. Describe the change in Dravot and Carnehan’s relationship from the beginning to the end of the story. What is the catalyst for the change and what is the result? Use evidence from the text to support your response.
Dravot and Carnehan were best friends who set out to be kings of India and rule the land together. The power that they ended up receiving fogged Dravot’s mind because he was acting as if he was the only king of the land and no longer took into consideration of Carnehan’s thoughts.
2. How do the narrator, Dravot, and Peachy each represent an aspect of the British Empire? Use evidence from the text to support your response.
Dravot is a representation of the worst of the British Empire. Hes greedy with the power and wants it all to himself. Peachy is the good side and the best of the Empire. He is always ready to lend a helping hand and show that there is good in the country.
In 8-10 sentences, answer the questions below based on your reading of The Man Who Would Be King and study of the British Empire.
3. How is Dravot and Carnehan’s adventure representative of the British Empire? Discuss at least three specific parallels using support from the text.
The Empire, as we all know, was a very powerful nation and ruled many other countries very sternly. When Dravot and Carnehan took over, they caused the empire to fall because they fought over the throne and over who the power belonged to. You cannot have a joint leadership when only one of them is making all the rulings and calling all the shots without taking into consideration what the other has to say about the ruling. The empire worked as it was before both of them ruled it. However, when they took over, they just caused it to crash horrendously.
4. Was Kipling using his novella, The Man Who Would Be King, as support of the concept of “noblesse oblige?” Discuss specific evidence from the text, Kipling’s “The White Man’s Burden,” and the context of Kipling’s life.
Yes this story is representation of the concept of “noblesse oblige.” It is a story of two men who try to come together to rule a poor country and make it better. They were in good with the empire but slowly caused it to crash. The two friends, Dravot and Carnehan, came together to help the poor people which is essentially what the noblesse oblige is all about. The superior and rich helping the inferior and poor or less fortunate. Carnehan used to lead armies and Dravot controlled the justices. He eventually was ready to settle down and marry so he decided to marry a woman of the village. Peachy tried to remind him that the people were crazy but he did not want to listen. So he did what he wanted. Which, unfortunately, led to his inevitable death of being thrown off the cliff by his wife because the priest believed he was a god. And to prove he wasn’t, she bit him and pushed him off. They attempted to crucify Peachy, but because he did not die in the crucifying process, he was released.
helping hand and show that there is good in the country.


I'm Katy

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out