Based on the article presented, I strongly recommend that Baby Theresa’s organs should not be held accountable for other purposes. Therefore, to create a more consistent understanding of my arguments, this brief synopsis of my ideas aims to present it from three different ethical perspectives. Accordingly, these three Ethical perspectives include: The Divine Command perspective, the Ethics of rights and the Ethics of Duty.
To begin with, the divine command perspective emphasizes right or wrong is determined by religious principles or by a supreme being. According to the Bible, it states “whoever Shed human blood, by humans shall their blood be shed; for in the image of God has God made mankind” (Genesis 9: 5-6, New International version). Furthermore, it claims “Have nothing to do with a false charge and do not put an innocent or honest person to death for I will not acquit the guilty” (Exodus 23: 7, New International Version). As a matter of fact, Baby Theresa is an innocent person and she is made through the image God. Hence, whoever wants to kill Baby Theresa such that they can transplant her organs, is merely doing wrong because they are disobeying their supreme being. Subsequently, as we know, disobeying our supreme being comes with its negative outcomes. Likewise, when we kill Baby Theresa it shows that we do not appreciate God’s creation, because each person was made through the image of God. Therefore, we cannot contradict this, as what our supreme being commands about killing an innocent person cannot be rejected.
In addition, we have the Ethics of Rights, which claims that the rights entitled to each individual should be respected and anybody cannot violate it. According to (“Examples of Rights Based Ethics”, 2016) it explains that each person has a right to Liberty and life. In relation to the case of Baby Theresa, all of this rights are totally rejected. The article says that her parents insists for her organs to be transplanted to save other people’s lives. However, Baby Theresa has a right to life, therefore she should live as long she could resist to live, regardless of the circumstances. Also, the right to liberty plays an important role in this situation. In regards to this, liberty means the state of being free within society from oppressive restrictions imposed by authority on one’s way of life, behaviour, or political views. Likewise, the articles states, Florida law at that time claims the removal of organs should only be accountable until the donor is dead. Henceforth, I believe that Baby Theresa’s organs should not be transplanted to save the other kids lives because the right of Liberty emphasizes that individuals should live their way of life regardless of the oppressive restrictions imposed by authority (law).


I'm Katy

Would you like to get a custom essay? How about receiving a customized one?

Check it out